Mideast nations overlook differences to unite against the threat of Iran
Lt. Col. Rick Francona
The Bush administration proposes to sell $30 billion worth of arms to Saudi
Arabia, Egypt and other "moderate"Arab countries. Surprisingly, the only real
objections are coming from members of the U.S. Congress rather than from who you
might expect – the Israelis. Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert said, “We
understand the need of the United States to support the Arab moderate states and
there is a need for a united front between the U.S. and us regarding Iran."
Why aren't the Israelis up in arms, so to speak?
Almost every time the United States has proposed selling high-tech weaponry to
Arab countries in the past, the Israelis have objected and mobilized their
supporters (“the lobby”) to derail the deal or at least mitigate the effect. For
example, when the United States sold F-15 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia in the
1980's, Israel insisted that the avionics package included in the deal be of
lesser capability than that of Israeli air force F-15's and was not to include
the conformal fuel tanks (known as “fast packs”) that would extend the range of
the Saudi fighters to pose a threat to the Jewish state. Similar, although
unsuccessful, efforts were mounted to prevent the sale of AWACS aircraft to the
Kingdom.
There is a lot of behind-the-scenes political maneuvering going on in the region
-- nothing new. The Israelis have determined that their primary threat, or as
they say, the "existential threat," is Iran. Although they are technically still
in a state of war with some of the Arab countries, they have made peace with two
key players – Egypt and Jordan. Syria, an ally of Iran, remains the critical
holdout.
'No war without Egypt, no peace without Syria'
There is an old Middle East adage: "No war without Egypt, no peace without
Syria." Israel recently failed to strike a deal with Damascus that would end
Iran's access to Syria's airports and thus prevent Iran's Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps from providing money, weapons and training to Hezbollah, Hamas,
Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups in the Levant. After Syrian president
Bashar al-Assad stated that he would be willing to have direct talks with
Israel, it only took Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad two days to get on a
plane to Damascus and make sure Syria remained in Tehran's sphere of influence.
He also brought $1 billion for the cash-strapped Syrian regime to buy weapons
from Iran.
If the Israelis cannot entice the Syrians away from their primary sponsor in
return for a commitment to return the occupied Golan Heights, the next step is
to not stand in the way of American efforts to bolster the moderate Arabs states
as a counterbalance to growing Iranian power and influence. If Iran is truly the
existential threat to Israel, anything that mitigates Iranian capabilities is a
good thing.
The foreign ministers of Egypt and Jordan recently visited Jerusalem to talk to
the Israelis about regional security. The initial announcement about the visit
touted it as the first overture by the Arab League to Israel. Arab League
sponsorship of the meeting was later withdrawn in the face of opposition from
some member states, but in essence it was in fact an overture on behalf of the
League. The visit was driven by the realization on the part of the mainstream
Arabs that there is one common concern they share with the Israelis – the
ascendancy of Iran as a major power broker in the region. There is another
Middle East adage (there are plenty of them), “The enemy of my enemy is my
friend." Fear of Iran creates strange bedfellows.
Let's not overlook the fact that part of the arms deal includes a 25 percent
increase in the amount of American military aid for Israel, estimated to be at
about $30 billion over the next ten years. Although there is substantial support
to Arab states, Israel gains as well.
Something to keep in the back of your mind as this all plays out: none of the
Arab states that are involved in this deal, in fact, virtually none of the Arab
states with the exception of Syria, want to see an Iran with nuclear weapons and
the missiles to deliver them. It does not appear that there is an international
diplomatic solution to this problem, nor are the Israelis sure that anyone else
(like the United States) is willing to act militarily against the Iranian
nuclear research facilities. At some point, the leadership in Tel Aviv may
decide that they have to attempt an attack. It's a long way from Israel to Iran,
virtually all of if through Arab airspace.
Perhaps the Arabs are going to look the other way as the Israeli jets pass
through? Sounds far-fetched, right? So does an Arab League delegation meeting
with the Israelis. So does almost no Israeli objection to the sale of advanced
weapons to Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries.
MSNBC